If warriors do need a boost (beyond the reliance on consumables that has been discussed elsewhere) why not give warriors innate proficiency to 103% (105??) of all weapons then +% as usual for the experts and mastery. Raise their caps to 120% in any weapon if they can get it.
This would allow an innate advantage to fully trained warriors to reflect their mastery of combat.
Thoughts and ideas?
L-A
warriors are fine how they are
I agree. Warriors already have a great many strengths at their disposal.
and of course you get the only two who haven't actually said anything about tone-ups in other threads. 
People aren't really thinking that warriors need a boost (I think), but instead are saying that certain races (non-giant-sized)+warrior need boosting (such as half-elf warriors).
Well half-elves get the training bonus and one prac bonus as do elves. They have better str than elves, decent wis. They can be pretty good when I think about it, but that is taking into consideration cabals.
People aren't really thinking that warriors need a boost (I think)' date=' but instead are saying that certain races (non-giant-sized)+warrior need boosting (such as half-elf warriors).[/quote']
They call them blademasters and crusader-wannabes
Half-elves don't a get one practice bonus....
My mistake mister know-it-all, pk prowess extreme duder, game crasher
Dang straight. And don't you forget it!
Forget what?
hah! i just thought of the perfect way to help non-giant warriors... just make disarm dexterity based!
If all that is worrying people is that giant sized races are well suited to warriors does that mean drow/elf mages need to be rebalanced?
Some races will excel over others with certain classes.
L-A
If all that is worrying people is that giant sized races are well suited to warriors does that mean drow/elf mages need to be rebalanced?
Some races will excel over others with certain classes.
L-A
Well, damn. Maybe someone's actually thinkin.
Yes, allowing elves to be warriors is about as pointless as fire giant invokers. But that doesn't mean we need to allow fire giant invokers or balance elf warriors.
Back in my day, 100% was the highest you could get, and it was all that you needed, and no one complained.
We also walked 40 ticks around all of Aabahran on foot with no mounts and no flight! When it was storming; as it always used to back in those days thanks to the likes of all the rangers and invokers.
Back in my day, 100% was the highest you could get, and it was all that you needed, and no one complained.
We also walked 40 ticks around all of Aabahran on foot with no mounts and no flight! When it was storming; as it always used to back in those days thanks to the likes of all the rangers and invokers.
Was it uphill both ways too?
Of course.
Calandra......
Back in my day, 100% was the highest you could get, and it was all that you needed, and no one complained.
We also walked 40 ticks around all of Aabahran on foot with no mounts and no flight! When it was storming; as it always used to back in those days thanks to the likes of all the rangers and invokers.
Yeah, any time the weather changed I started quaffing detect invis potions and typing where Calandra. Was cool too without the whole mount system.
Was cool too without the whole mount system.
Of course the flight potion were a bit different back then too, making up for the lack of mounts.