XXX Numbers (Like Cabal Numbers)

No.

@Dale you didn't shut him down, he's just laughing at the picture of Anamus ripping off your male appendage and throwing it at your ghost who will then go on to need to use said appendage for skin grafts for the wicked scars the remain once you're no longer a ghost.

I like the idea, but perhaps instead of it saying how many of each there are, we only show how many are actually available. Meaning if the staff were to only allow a max of 2 Vampires and 1 was active but the other was not, it would still show 1 being available because of it. If the other one becomes active again before or even after the third person gains it, it would just mean that no others would have to waste their times trying to go for that slot but they could try for another entirely.

In the terms for Demons it could be given a max per class if that is the deciding factor, or it could be based off of the size of the PB. When it comes to the obvious qraces this will only serve to help those who are wanting to try them out know whether or not they will have a chance at gaining it as long as their RP is good enough for such. Obviously in the case of Vampires it's harder to do because it'll give away anyone who's masquerading still, but a majority of people who play the game know instantly whether someone is going to know whether someone is or not regardless. It would also allow players who are returning the chance to see whether it's worth their time or not to try for it assuming this is of course showing how many spots are available for each.

1 hour ago, Tantangel said:

@Dale you didn't shut him down, he's just laughing at the picture of Anamus ripping off your male appendage and throwing it at your ghost who will then go on to need to use said appendage for skin grafts for the wicked scars the remain once you're no longer a ghost.

I like the idea, but perhaps instead of it saying how many of each there are, we only show how many are actually available. Meaning if the staff were to only allow a max of 2 Vampires and 1 was active but the other was not, it would still show 1 being available because of it. If the other one becomes active again before or even after the third person gains it, it would just mean that no others would have to waste their times trying to go for that slot but they could try for another entirely.

In the terms for Demons it could be given a max per class if that is the deciding factor, or it could be based off of the size of the PB. When it comes to the obvious qraces this will only serve to help those who are wanting to try them out know whether or not they will have a chance at gaining it as long as their RP is good enough for such. Obviously in the case of Vampires it's harder to do because it'll give away anyone who's masquerading still, but a majority of people who play the game know instantly whether someone is going to know whether someone is or not regardless. It would also allow players who are returning the chance to see whether it's worth their time or not to try for it assuming this is of course showing how many spots are available for each.

Lol Okay.  I'm  sure.

5 hours ago, Dale said:

Demon invoker, or demon cleric.  I'd poop all over Anamus.

Only if is splatters as you defecate from their mere presence...

I don't see this happening anytime soon..

Numbers for qraces are fluid, and some qraces have their status "hidden" until they decide to show Aabahran who they really are.

Secondly, we may decide to allow more than # vampires, or # liches, or # avatars at any given time. Keep in mind, if you submit an application for one which we won't allow anymore additional of, we'll let you know so that you don't waste your time or so you know you'll be waiting awhile.

If I'm going for a qrace/class I'll politely ask on prayer if there's a spot and get a pretty prompt answer. 

If the imms don't mind the extra work of answering, I don't see anything wrong with the current system. 

Id love as much stuff as possible to be automated, but unless you're dying for the statistics I don't see the need.

Cool, as long as IMM's don't mind answering when asked in the forums, I think that is fine - Just a thought as always.

Thanks for your time.

Just saw this. For the record, if you wanna poop on a high ranked Knight cleric played like Anamus, make a neutral..especially a thief/powerful melee (Jaspurr halfling/ranger/warmaster defeated Anamus in a duel), not a demon cleric or an evil invoker.

If you are evil, anything less than Thulgan-level melee output isn't going to cut it. Or maybe an exceptionally played DK ;)

Believe it not, invokers just got meleed/oproged to death pretty quick and had insufficient burst potential to cause any danger, making them trivial fights. Ask Sepahoona how it went as a powerful evil cleric (who stomped me as a low ranked Knight, btw).

But then again, balance has changed since then, so hopefully another character like Anamus cannot exist and the combination is not quite as intimidating. I'm out of the loop.

Have there been other dominant good clerics since then? Good clerics were unheard of before Anamus.