Implementor Anume Posted March 23, 2008 Implementor Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexi Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 Running the longest is not the same as running the fastest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyzarius Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 Running the longest is not the same as running the fastest. thats what i have ben trying to say moves in NO WAY signifies speed, just endurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudder Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 You guys are all stupid. You ever heard fast and steady wins the race? Speed = Distance/Time Right? Running from Val Miran to Miruvhor. If John is super fast but can only has 20 moves, John won't be able to go far at all. Billy however, is much slower but has 1000 moves. Billy will arrive at his destination much FASTER than John. Use the formula. Speed = Distance / Time. Who had the greater speed? Stop being so narrow minded. I bet your all religious republicans! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyzarius Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 You guys are all stupid. You ever heard fast and steady wins the race? Speed = Distance/Time Right? Running from Val Miran to Miruvhor. If John is super fast but can only has 20 moves, John won't be able to go far at all. Billy however, is much slower but has 1000 moves. Billy will arrive at his destination much FASTER than John. Use the formula. Speed = Distance / Time. Who had the greater speed? Stop being so narrow minded. I bet your all religious republicans! Moves STILL indicates ENDURANCE. It is a measure of how FAR you can go, not how fast. No matter how you say it. The person in your example loses the race because they are not endurant enough to complete it, but John is still faster for those 20 spaces. S=D/T (S being speed, D being distance traveled, Time being the time it took to travel it) so John only traveled 20 spaces, the formula would then be S=20/T for John. You cannot calc John's speed using this formula using a distance he DIDNT travel, that would not be accurate. You can say that John didnt have enough stamina (moves) to complete the race however. The only way to show, mechanically, speed in FL is to change the built in delay on moving N,E,W,S,U,D. Like with forestwalk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex-D&Der Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 S=D/T (S being speed' date=' D being distance traveled, Time being the time it took to travel it) so John only traveled 20 spaces, the formula would then be S=20/T for John. You cannot calc John's speed using this formula using a distance he DIDNT travel, that would not be accurate.[/quote'] Wouldn't his total time just be higher? Like with pit stops in an auto race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a-guitarist Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 I'm waiting on the obligatory "Arguing on the interweb is like...." picture. a-g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyzarius Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 I'm waiting on the obligatory "Arguing on the interweb is like...." picture. a-g pfft, we are discussing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.