Filth Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I admit I have been "back" for a spell but have been unable to produce anything meaningful. I had a pinned ranger running around for a bit (my first successful melee ever!) and a rogue razing around. It seems lately, however, I've been spending more time reading through the forum than actually playing the game. I'm having a character creation crisis. Things are looking very interesting though. Clans, spell casting charmies, Lloth, my class being toned down (though I never used Traven). I'm missing a lot of exciting things and I wonder, how are things on the inside? Is the battle between good and evil a pretty fair fight or is the land calling for a little neutral gnome to balance the world with some well placed fireballs? Are the mages getting squished by the mighty fortress? Is law's reach suffocating the friends of a little mischief? What's needed? What is not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deykari Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Non-goodie Savants please. Dey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinblades713 Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I left savant and all the rascals came out from their holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest emp_newb Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 NO GUHNOMES!!! I AM GUHNOME LORD! The battle is even power wise. Evil has some stronger players, but there are alot of strong goodies. Nexus actually could use some help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WagesofSin Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I'm missing a lot of exciting things and I wonder, how are things on the inside? Is the battle between good and evil a pretty fair fight or is the land calling for a little neutral gnome to balance the world with some well placed fireballs? Great! Go gnome! But replace fireballs with insane physical prowess. That's right, I told you to make a gnome melee. Now go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filth Posted July 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 What if I figure out a way to make a gnome who can wield a big weapon with brain power . . ? Maybe I can get him to hold a sword. P.S. It is sooooooo hard to take anything you say seriously, emp, with that avatar. In fact I don't even remember what you said, I just remember a lot of teeth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Some neutral ogre ranger came through and ate all the evils. Now it seems balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mya Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 "Non-goodie Savants please." Non-goodies Warmasters please. Savant could use a Giant Cleric, or a non elven/drow Battlemage. It's quite strange. Best Savant combos to fight Warmasters, are combos that rely on melee power. Tribunal could use a Evil Cleric. Knights a Warrior or a Zerk. Nexus would be open for a Necro. And the syndicate for a Psi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I think a NEXUS warrior would be a nice addition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filth Posted July 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I thought there was a psi in syndicate. I remember he was beating up my ranger. That was a little while ago though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest emp_newb Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Best Savant combos to fight Warmasters' date=' are combos that rely on melee power.[/quote'] I disagree. I have played a Savant bmg, 2 clerics, and a voker. Voker has been BY FAR the most potent WM killer. I think at least half the WMs who have fought Pildo would agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.