feign

[The-Nameless]

see that is what I thought that they could power grip in one hand, or two hands.

[Sandbox]

And are you certain warriors can not do that too?

with powergrip you always drop it in your inventory, you only get the other bonuses when you doublegrip something.

[mya]

Doesn't powergrip does more damage or is it double grip?

[mya]

"actually i cant believe i didn't try this a long time ago.." Sandobox

Try what?

[Sandbox]

"actually i cant believe i didn't try this a long time ago.." Sandobox

Try what?

which classes dont have swords? now write them all down, what cabal does that sound like with exception to bmg's...

lol..

[mya]

Let me check my table:

Classes with no sword:

Invoker

Necromance

Clerics (Cleric+Shaman+Healer)

What you should look is for Daggers:

Classes with no dagger:

Communers (PALADINS Clerics,Healer+Shaman)

[Sandbox]

Either way you look at it. It's a way to land some nasty dmg to c/cs

[mya]

Ever seen a Warriors only sword?

[Aulian]

Shrug.

I reckon a whiplock warrior OWNS. Mine did. Its like any class, just because you have ONE skill doesnt make it the be all or end all of a class. Its all about using the skill at the right time, not just assuming its going to be - oh dirt, weapon lock, IVE WON!

Pfft.

[The-Nameless]

it is not all about weapon knowledge based on skill. There is a chart showing a weapons offensive, defense, to disarm with, and how easy/hard they are to disarm.

Sword is less offensive than axe but is more defensive etc etc

I think whip is most offensive, and best to disarm with

Staff is easiest to disarm, hardest to disarm with.

Dont quote me but I think those are right

[Sandbox]

Lol. One day ill roll that feign dwarf gladiator and watch heads roll.

Edit.my bard was doing mangles consistently to invokers with a sword through sanc.

[mya]

Unless you played a Bard in FL 1.0 or early FL 2.0 and exploiting Gnomes Blunt damage type vulnerability then I doubt it.

That is a lot of damage to be pulling through Sanctuary.

Mangles

[The-Nameless]

Yea, I have played zerks that rage and consistantly do mutilates through sanc.

[mya]

Keyword: Bard.

[Croyvern]

A well dressed bard. With that nifty title. Sir.

[Pali]

Ever seen a Warriors only sword?

Yes. You've just never used it.

[mya]

PK Log??? I want to see this.

[Pali]

Uh... you seriously don't know that there is a warrior-only sword? I thought you were just kidding.

[mya]

No, Log on the Mangle through Sanctuary on a Invoker with a Bard wielding a Sword.

[f0xx]

I don't believe the mangle through sanc too

Not with a bard.

[Croyvern]

I am going to get that sword.

New to me, new to Sandbox, always in, and simply very nice against invokers.

[Pali]

No' date=' Log on the Mangle through Sanctuary on a Invoker with a Bard wielding a Sword.[/quote']

Ah. Yeah, I wouldn't believe that without a log either.

[Sandbox]

It's not too hard to do mangles with 63 damroll buffed and a 23 avg dmg weapon. I thought we were over this bards suck mentality. Bards shred monks as well I've got some nifty monk shreading logs. I didn't log any invokers fights because they never lasted more than 3-4 rounds. Thief shred bards just as hard though.

[Dale]

It's not too hard to do mangles with 63 damroll buffed and a 23 avg dmg weapon. I thought we were over this bards suck mentality. Bards shred monks as well I've got some nifty monk shreading logs. I didn't log any invokers fights because they never lasted more than 3-4 rounds. Thief shred bards just as hard though.

I've had an 80 dam roll with an average 30 damage weapon and didn't hit mangles through sanc.

[f0xx]

It's not too hard to do mangles with 63 damroll buffed and a 23 avg dmg weapon.

Lol Sandy, put your glasses on and re-read your log. You would be surprised to see that the person is not in sanc.

PS. 23 avg damage is not even considered good weapon.