jibber Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 So, 2000 CP for 72 hours instead of 500 CP for 72 hours. Nice. (of course, that's given all of your rares are lvl 50, and not higher) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Wow, 2 rares crumble on every death? + bounty eq loss? and loots? Worst change ever :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mali Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 I don't know how I feel about it :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tassinvegeta Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Well it helps with rare circulation especially by going through LI though I wonder how its affected the pb statistics so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liadon Xiloscient Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 There is no point in Smurfing anymore... Just take it out completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erana Posted June 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 This improves the value of the moderate tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liadon Xiloscient Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindflayer Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 makes me want to roll my first moderate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aulian Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 he problems with death to b avoided? You mean people just keep throwing themselves at people with no thought of the consequences of their death? Sounds reasonable. So many people have been complaining about no rares being around. This will DEFINITELY help. I would agree with the large number of of people saying we'd like you to consider raising the rare limit above five. I like to play melee classes, and what I go for first are my weapon selection. If a melee isn't holding at least five different options (polearm, shield, flail, whip or axe, sword or sanc staff or exotic or staff) he's asking for a stomping. After that I go about trying to upgrade my nonrare armor for rares/uniques. Because with melees, you can be decked to the hilt, and if you choose the wrong weapon to fight a class with, you're just making it that much harder on yourself.. Just my 2 cents. Holy Christ... So many items... I've played lots of warriors, dont know how you'd need all those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inscribed Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 if we are going to encourage more rare circulation, can we first focus on decreasing some of the classes reliance on equipment. it seems like you are gunning for ruthless tier melee characters with this. there have been several threads in the past on how to address this, including innate bonuses for melee characters based on equipment, or rebalancing equipment to get rid of the god suits and make non-rares more viable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f0xx Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 There is no point in Smurfing anymore... Just take it out completely. Lol Lia, you've got it all wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liadon Xiloscient Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 How? I mean... everyone that I chat with keeps pushing me to get away from Smurf and to take a bold step into the ruthless world. So far I'm seeing more of a benefit doing it this way. Sure I generally get lucky when I actually focus on getting equipment then I train super hard and make hunting at level 15 - 30 look easy. Plus good equipment makes the hunting move SO MUCH more smooth. In any case, because of my current mood and hostility I'm rolling up my first evil character... -__- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f0xx Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Rolling an evil is a good idea. As for smurves (I guess that's the plural?) - they are not affected by the crumbling change. The ruthless tier becomes more of a hardcore tier now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liadon Xiloscient Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 *shrug* I don't care at this point... Sorry for being so hostile... just irritated with everything now I think. T__T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oni Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 Crumbling on getting collected by a bounty seems a bit rough. You're already auto losing at least three items which might very well be sac'ed once they're received by the person who placed the bounty, usually six items with the autocollect by the person who collected your bounty. Seems a bit rough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jibber Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 Crumbling on getting collected by a bounty seems a bit rough. You're already auto losing at least three items which might very well be sac'ed once they're received by the person who placed the bounty' date=' usually six items with the autocollect by the person who collected your bounty. Seems a bit rough.[/quote'] Quite easily 8 rares lost in this circumstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Nameless Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 yea, for bountier, for collector, and for crumble. Not to mention the syndi may want to actually loot something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aulian Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 On another note. I have seen a large number of people running around the lands these days. Not only that that, but having lost my entire suit, I've had the pleasure of looking for rares and they've actually been in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pali Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 On another note. I have seen a large number of people running around the lands these days. Not only that that, but having lost my entire suit, I've had the pleasure of looking for rares and they've actually been in. Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demiterracotta Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 Color me stupid. (No seriously I know nothing about code or any of that.) But couldn't the change have been something along the lines of: Ruthless Characters under the protection of LI with 5 or more rares will now have two crumble upon a death. Just curious. I don't know if bounties can collect on people with LI or any of that.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f0xx Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 Ruthless Characters under the protection of LI with 5 or more rares will now have two crumble upon a death. That's quite the better idea actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaboomer Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 I lost a piece today due to a crumble, awaited a reboot, and they weren't there. Then I killed the mob and checked again. No luck. Is this the intended effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyzarius Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 Ruthless Characters under the protection of LI with 5 or more rares will now have two crumble upon a death. so you mean, do not punish the ENTIRE pbase, but actually focus on the issue at hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f0xx Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 so you mean' date=' do not punish the ENTIRE pbase, but actually focus on the issue at hand? [/quote'] What I was thinking exactly. I don't see why the whole PB has to suffer because of a few decked characters who like to play it safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pali Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 I lost a piece today due to a crumble, awaited a reboot, and they weren't there. Then I killed the mob and checked again. No luck. Is this the intended effect? Could be that someone else killed the mob and grabbed the item before the reboot you waited for happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.