Raargant Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 Bigger is not better. Not if the average quality of the pbase devolves to crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sneak Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 so you want to keep fl a niche game for a small playerbase? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatMike Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 I don't think that's what he's saying but if it comes to having 100 online at a time and 60 of them are garbage that's alot more trouble than it's worth. If we have 30-40 good people online it's probably worth the effort. It would be nice to have 75-100 good people online all the time, but I honestly don't know how to go about getting all these folks to try us out besides voting and reveiws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teralis Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 not really what he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chayesh Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 So, unless we do things Sneak's way, we don't want FL to grow. Uh huh. Well, you live in your world, Sneak, while we go over here and make FL better. Thanks for the creative input. Locking this thread (yet again) because it is doing nothing but starting trouble where there isn't any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raargant Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 so you want to keep fl a niche game for a small playerbase? If by 'niche' you mean 'classy and non-trashy', and by 'small', you mean 'as many quality pinns as there ever have been and growing', then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.