Aulian Posted June 3, 2012 Report Share Posted June 3, 2012 I agree, I found a staff was way more defenisve then a polearm on my warriors... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mya Posted June 4, 2012 Report Share Posted June 4, 2012 I agree' date=' I found a staff was way more defenisve then a polearm on my warriors...[/quote'] -you meant offensive, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evangelion Posted June 4, 2012 Report Share Posted June 4, 2012 -you meant offensive' date=' right?[/quote'] ... it's good to have you back, Mya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Totenkopf- Posted June 4, 2012 Report Share Posted June 4, 2012 Both probably Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Nameless Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Now that all the silly staff nonsense is over with. Good aligned archer your say? Halfling Sigil should be just about unkillable. Elf Praetorian has alot of potential as well. Ogres generally don't make the best archers strictly because of Mana base in my experience. Not saying it cannot be done, but you will be taking unnecessary time because of the small pool. I thought bad about werebeasts until I played one honestly. My god was I surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trick Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Totally disagree with stating ogres are poor archers. Of all my archers, my strongest ones happened to be stone giant and ogre. Massive amounts of HP really help you out last the other archers, warriors, and ninjas that can shoot back. Mana will never be an issue for shooting. Now, if you couple it with cabal skills, insectswarm, and thunder storms, then yeah, obviously you might hit a little low numbers, but still you won't deplete. Ogres makes the best archers. Hands down. An argument can be made for Halfling as Dumela was ****in' annoying, but still, on an ogre ranger it was not difficult to out damage/out heal. Werebeast is also a terrible archer. You lose your bow when you transform. Why would you take a path that is useless to you when you transform? But hey, people do well with different races/classes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Nameless Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Why would you take a path that is useless to you when you transform? Werebeasts lose archery when they transform, but if your not going the pure archery route then the non eq dependancy of an archer ranger means you are lowering your eq dependancy and making it a bonus, not a necessity. thats 20/20 naked, Add in absolute basics and your looking upwards of 45/45 in rubbish. Eliminating the need for EQ is a huge boost that alot of people overlook that I feel is worth mentioning. I miss Kadrinath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trick Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Removing the factor for EQ dependency was a valid statement when everyone didn't have insane top level equipment. It's now too easy to get equipment to use that as motivation for a PK style. Now, if this were Kadrinath's time, I would totally agree that not needing EQ was a MAJOR bonus when rares were so hard to get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandbox Posted July 4, 2012 Report Share Posted July 4, 2012 The one in nexus was pretty beastly. Even with the gimpage. she's not gone, just shelved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.