Jump to content

Tour de France


Designated_Driver

Recommended Posts

Traitor! Off with his head! Wait..that was fairly British of me..

Disclaimer: Americans are pacifistic. We've never started a war. We've never done anything bad. In fact, we've never made anyone unhappy. Come, hold hands and pray. Yes, that's it. I feel the righteous vibe of God's chosen communing, and the smell of something. Something good.

Edit: I challenge ye chaps to a fair game o'shuffleboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Traitor! Off with his head! Wait..that was fairly British of me..

Disclaimer: Americans are pacifistic. We've never started a war. We've never done anything bad. In fact, we've never made anyone unhappy. Come, hold hands and pray. Yes, that's it. I feel the righteous vibe of God's chosen communing, and the smell of something. Something good.

Edit: I challenge ye chaps to a fair game o'shuffleboard.

Is it just me who doesn't have a clue what you're talking about? :P I think somebody slipped something into your good ol' British cuppa cha'.

Dey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One time use of steroids would have no affect on performance. If he had used them continually, over the course of weeks, then he would have had a better show, but earlier tests would have shown, which they didn't. Now unless something new has turned up and I haven't read it yet, the second sample has yet to be tested and there are discrepancies if the cortisone shots he was taking for pain, and shots that are approved by the biking association of whatever, could have this affect. And this isn't the first time an american cyclist has been called on the use of drugs for performance, it happened to lance a lot too, incase anyone forgot. And it doesn't really matter to terribily much what the WADA says, because they have widlely been know to be, pricks one, and two; have inconsistencies in there tests. Every person who has appealed this call against them has had it repealed, shocking, isn't it? And don't forget, the WADA can't even give us a garuntee that the sample wasn't tampered with.

Oh, and how about innocent until proven guilty. Second sample gets tested, he gets the axe, I'll stand with you and pelt the guy with eggs, but until then, if you want to deport someone, look in the mirror.

WC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

woot

/CHEER :D:D:D:D

One time use of steroids would have no affect on performance. If he had used them continually, over the course of weeks, then he would have had a better show, but earlier tests would have shown, which they didn't. Now unless something new has turned up and I haven't read it yet, the second sample has yet to be tested and there are discrepancies if the cortisone shots he was taking for pain, and shots that are approved by the biking association of whatever, could have this affect. And this isn't the first time an american cyclist has been called on the use of drugs for performance, it happened to lance a lot too, incase anyone forgot. And it doesn't really matter to terribily much what the WADA says, because they have widlely been know to be, pricks one, and two; have inconsistencies in there tests. Every person who has appealed this call against them has had it repealed, shocking, isn't it? And don't forget, the WADA can't even give us a garuntee that the sample wasn't tampered with.

Oh, and how about innocent until proven guilty. Second sample gets tested, he gets the axe, I'll stand with you and pelt the guy with eggs, but until then, if you want to deport someone, look in the mirror.

WC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...