So what next a code quote to dispel doubts ?
That list is almost acurrate.
Except that gnomes had a blunt damage vulnerability, not a bashing vulnerability. You people always mistake gnomes with halflings.
Sizes
Obviously it is numerical. You don't program in "huge size" or "medium size", you have a variable (your size descriptor) that represents the value of a number. 
the sizes are
tiny
small
medium
large
huge
giant
I dont know how each race fits into each one but they are based on a number system. The system is not as simple as 1-6 though. My guess would be medium is set to 0 and they go positive and negative from there.
The races I am almost positive about the other stuff could be true or complete bull but that is how I figured it always worked.
No one has to believe me. Though don't forget, I was a builder on a number of muds, including this one. Thats the standard for ROM type muds.
I remember Celerity posted (different forum, long time ago) about this. It was a 1-5 thing if I remember correctly (exactly what she said here).
Mudders posts agree with this - and it seems he knows something about the code.
So that's two people with a decent amount of experience saying the same thing...
Just like Foxx Mulder, I don't believe in coincidences....
L-A
Ya I cant believe this even came under argument the sizes have been this way since Merc/Roms crossover back in 1993.
actually, it might be a 6 scale (opposed to 5) like lemming noted, but the structure and implications are the same
actually' date=' it might be a 6 scale (opposed to 5) like lemming noted, but the structure and implications are the same[/quote']
It might be a 1-30 scale with logarithmic increases between units, so a size 5 is ten times better than a size 4.
It isn't, but it MIGHT be.
It might be a 1-30 scale with logarithmic increases between units, so a size 5 is ten times better than a size 4.
It isn't, but it MIGHT be.
For using mathematical references, you get...
