What happens if you are in a caba; that has no alignment restrictions and doesnt encourage fighting amongst its members. Could a neutral person lead a party with a good and an evil of the same cabal?
Or does align always come before affiliation?!?
Just a thought
Last I asked on this topic, basic answer I got is that a good and an evil should NEVER be in a group together.
it's a rule thing
It's alignment before Cabal. If you're a Goodie and the Vendetta Cabal is a Goodie, you're not really supposed to fight them or anything. Suppose you could always take their standard and one of you could mercy the other but you really couldn't kill them.
If a Storm zerk barbarian combat worshiper kills a Fae invoker savant, that's grounds for outcast?
And possibly then some, depending on the Imm who pulls you up in the first place.
oh my god yeah!!! even if they are dumb enough to attack you, you must flee
Flee? Nah. Mercy them, then break out into lecture. Not like they can do anything but listen.
so you'd cripple them so your evil buddies can kill him. Yup, outacst
Pfff, S' why I hate playing goods, I don't like being restricted like that.
I've personally found it BS that if person A tries to kill person B, and instead person A himself dies, that person A gets off scotch free, generally, while B gets an outcast. You attack someone, try to kill them, and they have to do what they have to do, in order to stay alive.
But that's just me.
I'd have to agree with Raargant in this case. If a goodie attacks another goodie, then the first goodie has everything coming against him in the future. I think it should null and void the fact that he's a goodie in the future for said person, but that's just me.
This is why I've never personally like alignments. I've thought they always hinder RP rather than help it. In my McMUD, there would be no aligns and no ethos. There would be only religions to pick from and follow. In my McMUD Utopia, there would be no trash killers, or killed players who cry "trash" when it wasn't so. Yes... I have a dream.... but hey, McMUD, it could happen!
a-g
Disagree, because even if attacked, virtue would say you don't slay a good man.
which is why too many people roll a goodies when they should be rolling neutrals.
If you hate, despise or want to kill a goodie...you aren't a goodie. I am one of the people who always though Justice should be neutral only, though, but whaddever.
No, cuz a goodie can put another goodie in jail for crimes witout killing them.
I am one of the people who always though Justice should be neutral only' date=' though, but whaddever.[/quote']
Yup
No' date=' cuz a goodie can put another goodie in jail for crimes witout killing them.[/quote']
Yes, but I would think they would not be able to do something which sent a good man to his death witout intervening.
I mean, if a man was willing to kill a good man, is he good? Is it still killing if you KNOW they are going to die? I think so.
Lets not all get banned for getting in an argument about a cabal which hasn't existed for a year, k?
In the past, as a Savant, I've had goodie monks attack my goodie savants. In one case, I died because of it, because the goodie monk triplocked me, while evil blademaster beat the living dogsnot out of me. You know what I did? I killed the monk, and sent a scroll explaining why I did it, and that I had killed another follower of the goodie path, and explained that I no longer saw goodie monk as good at all, but virtually an enemy who hid behind goodie affiliations to get further into the cabal.
..
..
I was never punished. :-)