Syntax: Stow (item type) (container)
Purpose: To amplify storage.
The 'How to Use': You will use the above command 'Stow (item type) (container) to store all those item types in stated container.
For Example - Stow Herbs Knapsack. After using this command, all you have to do is type 'stow herb' and it will automatically put the herb in the container you specified. This eliminates having to type 'put herb in backpack.'
Or - Stow Weapons Backpack. After using this command all you have to do is type 'stow dagger' and it will put your dagger, or any other non rare weapon, in your backpack.
Endless other combinations - stow milk - stow potions - stow scrolls and so forth.
Is it a necessity? Nah. Would it make things easier? Yeah I think so.
stow pill sack
stow container backpack
stow weapon hole
stow ammunition quiver
stow herbs 2.backpack
get sack backpack
You get a sack from a sturdy backpack.
stow blue
You put a blue pill in a sack.
stow sack
You put a sack in a sturdy backpack.
stow all.leaves
You put some dark black leaves in a sturdy backpack.
You put some dark black leaves in a sturdy backpack.
You put some dark black leaves in a sturdy backpack.
You put some dark black leaves in a sturdy backpack.
You put some dark black leaves in a sturdy backpack.
put dagger 2.backpack
You put a fancy dagger in a sturdy backpack.
look in 2.backpack
(5) some dark black leaves
a fancy dagger
Hmmm. This shows promise. I know this too can be done with aliases, but I like it. In time, no rush.
I had completely forgotten about this suggestion.
Woo! Go Morl!
>6 scroll
You take a scroll from backpack.
>66 herb
You put herb into a backpack.
>644 scroll
You take bag from backpack.
You put a scroll into a bag.
You put bag into a backpack.
I've had this system for eons. :) Different numbers match different containers. Because, how often you start anything with a number? Can also include other symbols. If someone's interested of it, I can provide TINTIN-code. Including an alias that creates the aliases from data in variables.
Oh, not trying to say that this is useless change. Not at all. :)