Let's give me: A feral or halfling monk. I'll even let yall pick.
Here's an idea.
neither of those races suit a monks temperment.
I'll give you, say, a stone giant invoker. See how well that works out for ya.
a faerie berserker!
I wouldn't mind a Feral BMG.
I think a feral has the right temprament for to be a monk. I think that they aren't allowed because 24 is far more dex than any monk has a right to.
edit: Actually, a feral monk would rule, especially if they got a new unique skill.
Claws
syntax: claws
Life in the forsaken lands has warped the bodies of the Ferals, transforming their fingernails into sharp, retractable feline claws. Some members of this race choose to forgo weapons and fight with thier fists and claws. Similar to sheath, this command will either retract or draw out the claws.
Note: A feral monk in town with drawn claws will be treated as if they are wielding a weapon.
150 hp 95 mp 150 mv
claws
The claws are coming out, b*tch!![]()
I think a monk with 24 dex and fury would be a bit pushing it.
When I first started playing here all I wanted was a slith monk. They rule.
Drow monk would be badass.
Slith ranger would also be awesome.
Dwarf paladin.
Faerie Ninjas all the way.
I just want liches... oh, wait, they are out. I guess I'll have to find something else to long for...
WC
Agreed.
Im sure the imms had good reason for not putting them in but i'd always wondered about why not have neutral monks? I have a reasons for asking not that i'm gonna play a monk again soon but I almost think of a neutral monk before any other alignment.
Fire giant dark-knight.
Ogre Invoker Bring it!!!
Ogre invoker would own.
I would think ogres can't speak clearly enough to utter spells.
Ogre thinks .oO[cast hellstream]
Ogre says "hayllstremnh".
Ogre appears confused.
Ogre says "heilelssdraemnd".
Ogre shakes head in frustration.
Ogre says "hhyilelzsstdrqpehmandfgm".
Ogre says "ssscheitdt".
Illithid warrior ![]()
Illithid monk. Eight-tentacled monkey stance.