How come Mino berserkers get a special charge but Mino warriors dont?
Isn't it supposed to be a racial bonus? It's not like they get an abundant choice of classes/aligns/ethos' as it is.
Minotaur charge
Mino warriors do get a special charge, it's just not quite as special as zerkers. Zerkers do the axe thing, but both of them can charge with any weapon, which is not to be snorted at. They can also get the lag from charge repeatedly, regardless of timer, which can be very lethal with a warrior.
Mino warriors - to the best of my knowledge - do not get the lag like mino zerks on charge.
The reason for this? Balance.
L-A
Mino warriors - to the best of my knowledge - do not get the lag like mino zerks on charge.
The reason for this? Balance.
L-A
atleast it would be a warrior worth playing finally...
atleast it would be a warrior worth playing finally...
Warriors are a very strong class as they are now. Revamping them for the sake of something new is one thing, but if you think they need a revamp because they are underpowered, you're going to have a hard time finding supporters...
Warriors are a very strong class as they are now. Revamping them for the sake of something new is one thing' date=' but if you think they need a revamp because they are underpowered, you're going to have a hard time finding supporters...[/quote']
I will agree to disagree, try playing anything other than mino/giant/ogre...
Fine, when I have the time I will roll a feral or dwarf warrior. Although I might point out that you just said "Fine, trying playing anything except five races." There are very very few others classes where you can call five races a viable selection.
Fine' date=' when I have the time I will roll a feral or dwarf warrior. Although I might point out that you just said "Fine, trying playing anything except [b']five races." There are very very few others classes where you can call five races a viable selection.
clerics, thiefs, rangers, healers, invokers, necromancers, blademasters, ninjas, i can think of a few where i would be happy with 5 or more classes.
clerics' date=' thiefs, rangers, healers, invokers, necromancers, blademasters, ninjas, i can think of a few where i would be happy with 5 or more classes.[/quote']
In that case, can you write them for me please?
Start with the necromancers you mentioned.
In that case, can you write them for me please?
Start with the necromancers you mentioned.
necromancers:
Drow
Avian
Illithid
Undead
Human
clerics:
Storm
Fire
Drow
Elf
Human
Half-elf
duergar
dwarf
thiefs:
undead
avian
halfling
faerie
feral
rangers:
Ogre
Stone
Elf
Human
haflling
healers:
Human
elf
halfling
avian
dwarf
invokers:
Gnome
Faerie
Drow
Elf
avian
blademasters:
halfling
dwarf
feral
drow
elf
ninjas:
avian
drow
elf
feral
undead
half-elves can't be clerics. Avians can't be clerics either, and so, can't be healers.
my bad. i was questioning those two when i wrote it, heh.
I guess we just disagree on what are strong combos.
I guess we just disagree on what are strong combos.
i believe we agreed on viable, if you want to go with strong, i would say fire, ogre, and minotaur are the only "strong" warriors, and that would cut the majority of my others lists alteast by half as well.
I just think its crap that you have to play a giant sized to be a successful warrior. If you can prove other wise i would love to see that, because it would completely change my view on warriors as a whole.
There have been a number of successful halfling warriors, and some moderately successful dwarf warriors.
Just because you aren't successful with them, doesn't mean they aren't viable.
There have been a number of successful halfling warriors, and some moderately successful dwarf warriors.
Just because you aren't successful with them, doesn't mean they aren't viable.
name one?
Geldaran
Ghranteethaka (sp)
L-A
Athakeetha! 
You see.
This is why I have lackies.