This is a bit of a random question, and I'm not sure if this is the place, but can Avatars be in Warmaster? I was conjuring up ideas for new chars and that thought crossed my mind. It would be a difficult to RP character, but I love a challenge.
Warmaster Avatar?
I don't see why not.
So, can druids join Tribunal then, maybe shoot for a strong rp and go with it?
Sorry, just thought while we're asking different scenarios, I thought of this one, and figured why not?
Pretty sure the answer's no, though maybe they can be in Barbarian.
ANYTHING can become ANYTHING if you have the RP to support it, and when I say support I mean mind blowing support. However druid + tribunal = very very hated druid.
ANYTHING can become ANYTHING if you have the RP to support it' date=' and when I say support I mean mind blowing support. However druid + tribunal = very very hated druid.[/quote']
gimped as well, as has been said before...you are sorta betraying the roots of the druid helpfile to do this.
i've got a good rp idea for it though. if i ever get the balls to play it. course i'm having alot of fun right now with my current.
Heh, in Barbarian? I know they usually accept magical incantations and things as a barbarian, but your not even an acceptable class to get into Warmaster though, don't fit the requirements even I think, if your talking about the druid ofcourse.
What about werebeast ranger in Tribunal? Would that still be somewhat out of reach, maybe less enfasis on the mind blowing rp rather? I mean, yeah you are still a werebeast, granted powers from gaia and all, but just wondering...
It's been stated by an immortal, I don't remember who, that a druid in tribunal would have to get severely gimped.
I was talking about the original question of Avatars in Warmaster. Note the subject of the thread.
Heh, in Barbarian? I know they usually accept magical incantations and things as a barbarian, but your not even an acceptable class to get into Warmaster though, don't fit the requirements even I think, if your talking about the druid ofcourse.
What about werebeast ranger in Tribunal? Would that still be somewhat out of reach, maybe less enfasis on the mind blowing rp rather? I mean, yeah you are still a werebeast, granted powers from gaia and all, but just wondering...
were ranger trib would be more playable than a druid...though if you stuck with were and used the right rp trib still makes sense
and as for the original question...hasn't there been a WM avatar before? i would think babarian would let them in, just not gladiator.
WM avatar...hmmm...have to think about that for a bit and consider the help files.
My initial gut reaction is that it is a bit contradictory to their "purity of mind and body" shtick.
I thought Gladiator was meant to be like the 1.0 purity of mind and body warmasters, with Barbarian's allowing of magic to be more for the revelry of combat. But that's just me.
I was told that Avatars cannot become WMs or Savants because their Avatarly duties come before Cabal duties. So should there be any Evils within their own Cabal at the time, they would have to face-pwn them.
That was a while back though, when I asked a similar question.
Dey
I was told that Avatars cannot become WMs or Savants because their Avatarly duties come before Cabal duties. So should there be any Evils within their own Cabal at the time, they would have to face-pwn them.
That was a while back though, when I asked a similar question.
Dey
Very true. Think that was what Iru said on the matter as well.
Druid in Trib would get gimped, ranger in Trib is ok as long as not follower of nature.
take anything but lifeforce, its to easy to replace 
I have a hard time seeing avatar in anything but Knight seeing as how they are very anti-evil by nature, and wm is a cabal about combat. You'd have to stretch that rp pretty hard.
i've seen an Avatar in Savant (Llyros), and the RP that ensued was great. The High Seat was Clariana, the Light Seat was Llyros, and the Dark Seat was... um, crap, Chueh's Illithid Necro. Everyone else in the Tower was evil or neutral, I believe. it was some great RP (and PK, as there were battles galore) that otherwise would have been missing had the scenario been disallowed.
that, and that bastard Llyros would pop in, hellstream my demon bard, and pop back out. damn old Savant spell.
A question then, is battling within Cabals (to the death, excluding coup) allowed, extreme RP permitting? IE. Power struggles/big disagreements between members of Savant/WM or if an Avatar was in WM/Savant with evils in the same Cabal?
Dey
i cannot speak for the current staff, but i felt that if it's in the RP of the characters involved and the RP of the situation at hand, go for it. any cabal that handles multi-alignments will have powerstruggles (and even sometimes like-aligns, just less frequently). if it's done right, why not?
A question then, is battling within Cabals (to the death, excluding coup) allowed, extreme RP permitting? IE. Power struggles/big disagreements between members of Savant/WM or if an Avatar was in WM/Savant with evils in the same Cabal?
Dey
Considering that it's coded within some of them, absolutely...with the proper RP backing it up, that is.