120000 rolls later, I've determined it is utterly impossible to get higher than a 52 on a halfling blademaster.
Time to roll a gnome blademaster. 57, here I come.
120000 rolls later, I've determined it is utterly impossible to get higher than a 52 on a halfling blademaster.
Time to roll a gnome blademaster. 57, here I come.
I tried for a 53 on a halfling blademaster for hours and never got it, either.
You got a 53 on what Bherens ? I hope its not a elf pal becasue they could go 56.
But that is strange, my first pinacle elf pal took a 53 i think and had more HP's than my 56 elf pal pinacle. And the first spent some trains on CON due to repeated deaths.
Oh, that should be easy to figure, Mya.
Every gotten a 50 with a faerie before? Not gonna happen. Got a 54 on a slith one time;)
Oh' date=' that should be easy to figure, Mya.[/quote']
Something human.....
hahah everytime I see this post I think of the like....7 different ones on the old forum. [snickers]
50 000 rolls and best for elf adventurer is still a 53, the same one you can get in 15 min of rolling ![]()
So save em up for when you convert?
Get as high of a roll you can. Don't use your trains for adding str, con, whatever. Use eq to keep it up. Then convert, and you should have 6 trains to use at your whim. (Never tried it, just a theory, but thinking about it right now, I think you may end up with just 3, or just plain 0.)
Why? Use them! You will have the same ammount of trains by lvl 30 regardless, and you will have higher mana/hp from having maxed stats when you reverted to level 1! You do not lose anything by using the trains as an adventurer! screams in frustration
I've found that sometimes, train wise, it's better not to go adventurer, because you can get higher rolls with a normal class.
Depending on class the extra practices can make up for it.
Using trains on hp and mana at low ranks is bad as it affects your hp and mana per level, e.g If you have more hp for your level than your surposed to have, you wont get as much hp on your next rank.
save your trains for pinn.
Using trains on hp and mana at low ranks is bad as it affects your hp and mana per level, e.g If you have more hp for your level than your surposed to have, you wont get as much hp on your next rank.
save your trains for pinn.
Are you sure about this or is it just a theory?
thought trial and error I believe so, plus a friend of mine who codes gave me some insight.
Using trains on hp and mana at low ranks is bad as it affects your hp and mana per level, e.g If you have more hp for your level than your surposed to have, you wont get as much hp on your next rank.
save your trains for pinn.
I always do that. I don't know if it's exactly true, but I'm sure I heard it from somewhere.
Dey
Well i looked at the code and looked at the code and still dont know.
And i still looked more and i still dont know.
Best way to know is test it.
Make 2 gnome invocker.
One spend the trains as you gain them
The other wait for pinacle, and at the end see witch one has more HP's.
So save them for pinacle just to be sure, since most of PK happen at Pinacle, you should never need (mutch) those extra HP at low ranks.
Do not discuss the code. Period.
Personally, if I am going to use trains for hps, I am going to do it when I have 50 hp, and those 10 cn do some good, not when I have 600, and they don't make as big a difference. But that is just me.
What's the most anyone has gotten with an elf blademaster? Been rolling for yonks and can't get more then a 53 !!1